(minor) Spoilers for Tomb of Annihilation
Sounds like a pretty significant symbol, huh? But doing some digging, I can't find any depiction or reference to it, in old modules or new.
There's just this illustration from the book cover:
Let's zoom in:
Kiiiinda looks like two triangles glued together?
Or, a bit like this:
Or, a bit like this:
Ingwaz Rune |
What are the IMPLICATIONS? Well, some research into some new-agey corners of the internet suggests the Ingwaz rune represents "...isolation or separation in order to create a space or place where the process of transformation into higher states of being can occur. Rune of gestation and internal growth." The 'gestation,' and Acererak-as-father, are very in line with Throne of Salt's 'Womb of Annhilation' interpretation of the module.
I also got the line "...sacrifice occurs when one form is called upon to die so that a newly evolved form may begin to grow... The failure of a magical operation is often caused by the lack of the operator ‘letting go’ of some past form of manifestation so that a newly desired form can be born." Which to me sounds very lich-y. Ingwaz can't normally be reversed, since it's symmetrical, but it can be struck through and ruined, like the aleph rune on the forehead of the golem.
I also like that it kinda looks like two 'A's' glued together. Acererakarakarakarak
Check the cover of the DMG. It's the same staff.
ReplyDeletedefinitely, but if anything it's even HARDER to make out what the rune is, given that it's on an angle and smaller (other than it's maybe vaguely-triangle shaped)
DeleteSo I'm sticking with my 'defaced Ing' interpretation
Tomb of Annihilation is a deadly campaign in which few PCs make it through to the end. Such a campaign deserves an equally deadly final boss. And yet, we are constantly seeing DMs lament that the final fight with Acererak in Tomb of Annihilation was disappointing. As such, we’ve written this article to help DMs to run this encounter to its fullest potential.
ReplyDeleteI won't comment in full yet, since I've yet to run the encounter, but I have some opinions on why that 'final' confrontation was written the way it was. I think it could be better explained in the book, but I don't think it has to be disappointing- you just have to read between the lines a little bit :)
Delete